Ecstatic Astrologers and the Celestial Language

The concepts of a personal God, and of an impersonal super-cosmic or intra-cosmic Absolute, represent two ways of solving the problem of the meaning of existence. The former makes astrology quite superfluous, for the solution of all existential problems is “union with God” — or at least the ability to hold a “dialogue” with God, the absolute and never-failing Guide and Comforter. If, however, the universe is understood to exist through the cyclic interplay of cosmic Principles and of an “infinite Ocean of energy” astrology can be considered as a “celestial Language”.

Dane Rudhyar, “The Spiritual Value of Astrology

I have to admit that, in all my forty-seven years — despite growing up in the Presbyterian Church the son of a preacher — I’ve not been able to wrap my head around the notion of a personal God.

Now, a personal representative of God — that has made more sense to me.

As has the idea of “union” with That… although it’s hard to say that my experience of That is what they (the various scripture writers down through the ages) were referring to when they uttered a name for God.

From my perspective, a universally-acceptable definition of God remains out of reach — as does the absolute certainty that there exists such a Being as God, regardless of the definition.

I mean, does the samadhi of deep meditation equal God?

If I pray intensely and am overwhelmed “by the Spirit,” does this experience prove the existence of God… or does it prove the existence of ecstatic phenomena, without reference to an Ultimate Being?

Perhaps this is the reason why the Buddha left open the question of God, preferring instead to lay out a Path that would eliminate the need for conjecture.

Leaving aside the absolutist assertions of various revealed scriptures that have come down to us, let us suspend our arguments for and against the notion of God, and agree to entertain the idea that individual human beings — beings with a separate consciousness and identity from the Infinite — are incapable of truly “knowing” the Infinite… but that, within our limited range of possible understanding, there may be inspiring clues as to how our world may look from the perspective of God.

There is something of this in what Rudhyar was getting at in his quote.

He was not exactly denying that God could exist in a personal form, or that we humans may “lose ourselves” in this God through a type of spiritual union. In pointing toward a “Celestial Language,” however, he invited us to avail ourselves of an expression of Intelligence that may be decoded through a study of the relationship between our geocentric perspective and the heavens above.

If, indeed, humans were “created in the image” of the Elohim, it stands to reason that there is some correlation between the skies above (representing the outside-looking-in point-of-view of a God with omniscience, omnipresence and omnipotence) and the Earth below, along with its human inhabitants.

Most practicing astrologers would say that there is more than “some correlation,” but that a solid astrological understanding equals a profound opportunity to observe human life through the very eyes of the Celestial God.

* * *

For the record, I have a belief in a Unified Intelligence that “communicates” through many Mysteries… most of which remain encumbered in a morass of disinformation, power games, ignorance and confusion.

I believe that astrology is a valid “decoding machine” for the Mysteries, although a given interpretation is susceptible to fallible human bias.  If such bias is an unavoidable consequence of human life, then the question arises:  what sort of astrologer offers a bias most aligned with the Source of Celestial Language?

If a given astrologer comes predominantly from an intellectual/technical life-experience, with no direct (i.e., “ecstatic”) absorption in the all-pervading Divine, then this person’s consultation will offer all sorts of bells and whistles dug from a well-read bag o’ astrological tricks. I believe there is value in receiving a reading from such a technician, in that the client benefits from the combined portfolio of every astrologer to whom our technician has ever been exposed.  There is good and interesting information here… minus a “living bridge” that vivifies the consultation through the astrologer’s experience of spiritual union.

In modern times — thank goodness — many astrologers maintain daily spiritual practices, some of which are bound to produce ecstatic fruit.

Maurice Fernandez, for instance, is a certified kundalini yoga teacher (in the Yogi Bhajan lineage). I have personally attended some of his kundalini yoga sessions, and am willing to testify to the effectiveness of this practice in giving rise to charismatic phenomena. The “third-eye focus” that is so strongly emphasized during a kundalini yoga session brings an assortment of ecstacies, especially with all the intense “fire breathing” and other techniques that pepper a given yoga set.

A reading from Maurice is naturally informed by his spiritual practice, thus offering a living quality to the Mysteries that speak through the Celestial Language of astrology.

I believe, also, that my own experience as an ecstatic contemplative brings a profound connection with astrological information in a way that no book or lecturer could ever provide.

I say this not to toot my own horn, but to strongly hint that the counseling device of astrology — which purports to give insight (at the very least) into universal laws that are God-like in perspective — is nothing but rote recital when devoid of a unitive spiritual practice.

You want your astrologer, in other words, to be able to combine solid astrological understanding with a rigorous practice that brings spiritual authority to the expressions of Celestial Language.

You want to get yourself an astrologer who not only understands the Celestial Language, but who speaks it through the filter of daily “union with God” — beyond the need for conjecture.


6 thoughts on “Ecstatic Astrologers and the Celestial Language

  1. jhananda says:

    Yes, the samadhi of deep meditation is equal to communion with God, because it is the “ability to hold a ‘dialogue’ with God,” on God’s terms, in God’s language, not on human terms in a human language. And, God’s language is ecstatic phenomena. A comparative literary analysis of Indian and Christian religious literature shows that the samadhi of India is exactly equal to the Holy Spirit of the early Christian church.

    Now, the questions for astrology are, does the movement of the stars and planets have an effect upon humans, and if so, how and why? As an anthropologist who studies early religious literature and mystics, I know that the world-view of the mystics included a belief that heaven (akasha) was the stars in the night’s sky, and the actual points of light in the night sky were considered angels (devas).

    So, how did the column of smoke on the desert seen by Abraham and the burning bush of Moses become YHWH? It is the same way that Indra’s Net of Jewels became Vishnu’s Ocean of Milk and the Greek and Roman Milky Way. These are all references to the heavenly abode of the sacred that was directly experienced by mystics of the past and present.

    However, now that astronomy and space sciences has proven the points of light in the night sky are actually rocks and plasma balls in vast, vast empty space, then what does that do for astrology and present-day mystics? It just means that the physical universe is just a metaphor for the internal subjective reality of the mystic, so that the knowledge of planets and stars does not at all invalidate the heavenly experiences of the mystics. Astronomy and physics is just observing the physical universe, and mysticism is observing the spiritual universe.

  2. Eric Stewart says:

    As someone who is an animist, by definition and not any sense of personal identity (and this comes from various bursts of light that have come my way from time to time), it seems to me that space is filled with intent. My little logos, however, and here I refer to my mind, asks, “Who is it that intends?” Perhaps it is I, as it is that makes the grass green.

    It could be a blind creative force but that which is blind still has will, does it not? I am not demanding this “will” be named god. Such consideration is unnecessary. This is precisely why I have such a hard time answering the question, “Do you believe in God?” The necessary response is, “What do you MEAN by that?!?”

  3. adreampuppet says:

    Same with “what is enlightenment?” Half the battle is definition….

  4. online quran says:

    wow such a great post, so informative, thanks for sharing

  5. Indian Astrology is closely associated with Vedanta – the ancient indian philosophy which says “Thou Art Thou” aka I and my master are one !

  6. Great post, you have pointed out some fantastic details, I too conceive this is a very superb website.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s